Not a member yet? Why not Sign up today
Create an account  

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Gayest PK Ever"

#21
(11-15-2025, 06:29 AM)Cam102102 Wrote: W
Why would he come to me to write a doc and then ask him to remove my name. He came to me having issue with the elder and if members should have a hearing. Through out the talk i was very against the idea as the claims he came to me with are not out right codex breaks as it is my job to enforce the codex. The only minor one being relations not being voted on. I don't enjoy or like taking part in relations talks so i leave that up to the other HC to agree on. Seeing that was the only issue that is why my name was there. After speaking with other paladins and clearly a way to get the elder out of power i requested my name be removed. At this time paladins have been keeping a close eye on for awhile only adding to our suspicions.

Seeing that we already assumed you were working within the BOS with bad faith. Yes the screen shot was all we provided to staff to have remove. But these many cases and retelling is why you were removed but was not provided to staff. We just neatly compiled our case and reasoning behind your removal 

As for legion and MEF/Fiends. We have thrown around the idea but never came to agree if we were to follow through. Their are logs to back this up but no such go ahead for you to speak or change our standing with them. As the codex states "All final decisions must be approved by the High Council."

As for the quate of you saying you are already doing the job of the elder. I was there and can agree those words were said. I have no video or audio proof but was present for it.

Woah hold up a there buckaroo. I've got messages on standby to prove this but i NEVER signed anything, let alone having the knowledge of this document. Someone's framing me here jesus christ
Reply

#22
Just a heads up, I've already stated that we're not using the Document as proof against Licarde or anyone else - It says that in the initial rebuttal. I don't know why others, including Licarde, are using it as some sort of Gotcha trump card when we've already agreed that we believe Licarde in that his signature was forged. I only included it because it was worth documenting its existence even if we weren't using it.

Please re-read the post.

(Ignore the several deleted posts, the Forums are buggy as fuck and won't let me edit this message in order to correct some spelling mistakes despite saying I have the option - In fact, it'd just post the same post several times upon edit. 100% a command recursion issue lmao)
[ - CGC 5.0 Veteran - ]

[ - Brotherhood of Steel - ] - Apprentice Knight Sebastian Holloway : NCO - Power Armored Sniper
[ - Wardens - ] - Siambry Holloway : SNCO - Power Armored Field Medic

<---------------------->

[ - Divide 1.0 Veteran - ]

[ - Vault-Tec - ] - Scientist [REDACTED] : NCO - Stealth Suit Researcher

<----------------------> 

[ - Phoenix Day One - ]

[ - Crimson Caravan] - Director "Vinny" : HC - Director of Crafting & Sales
[ - Brotherhood of Steel - ] - Paladin Lionel : NCO - Power Armored Trackstar
[ - Desert Rangers - ] - Deputy Cloves : Enlisted - Bright-eyed Deputy
Reply

#23
So the Rebuttal to the PK being undone is just you scraping up every single speck of dirt you can get on him, and bringing up things that aren't even pertaining to the ability to PK at all. So basically you're just attacking his character instead of actually providing reasoning for the PK proper. Nothingburger, it's like that one spongebob scene where his brain is on fire and they're carrying documents everywhere and panicking.
Reply

#24
(11-15-2025, 04:20 PM)Tuna Wrote: Just a heads up, I've already stated that we're not using the Document as proof against Licarde or anyone else - It says that in the initial rebuttal. I don't know why others, including Licarde, are using it as some sort of Gotcha trump card when we've already agreed that we believe Licarde in that his signature was forged. I only included it because it was worth documenting its existence even if we weren't using it.

Please re-read the post.

(Ignore the several deleted posts, the Forums are buggy as fuck and won't let me edit this message in order to correct some spelling mistakes despite saying I have the option - In fact, it'd just post the same post several times upon edit. 100% a command recursion issue lmao)

"I only included it because it was worth documenting its existence even if we weren't using it." 
Why is that? Why would you include something entirely irrelevant if not to pad your very long and insubstantial portfolio attempting to discredit me as some bad faith mutiny actor lol. It is very clear to everyone what is going on here, which is why it can not be tolerated. 

Also:  "We chose to believe this and discarded the paperwork whilst continuing to remain suspicious of Licarde. I personally believe that it should be noted that within minutes of these talks with Licarde, our informant was suddenly blocked from viewing the document unceremoniously. When questioned about his signing of the paperwork, Head Paladin Agravain stated that he didn't understand what the document actually was and signed his name without considering the implications." 

You are clearly implying that you remain suspicious of my guilt in the authorship of this document. You are insulting the intelligence of everyone reading these posts. Also, the evidence I have provided (and that your team was privy to the entire time) demonstrates that Cam's supposed "lack of understanding" was a lie. 

Also also, in my initial response I didn't even provide the evidence outright. I just stated the reality of the situation. I only provided the evidence once Cam posted an incomplete picture lol.
Reply

#25
PK Reversal Accepted.

The PK will be fully reversed. Any knowledge of the events directly leading up to the PK for Licarde will be void.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)