11-15-2025, 06:47 AM
(11-15-2025, 06:29 AM)Cam102102 Wrote: W
Why would he come to me to write a doc and then ask him to remove my name. He came to me having issue with the elder and if members should have a hearing. Through out the talk i was very against the idea as the claims he came to me with are not out right codex breaks as it is my job to enforce the codex. The only minor one being relations not being voted on. I don't enjoy or like taking part in relations talks so i leave that up to the other HC to agree on. Seeing that was the only issue that is why my name was there. After speaking with other paladins and clearly a way to get the elder out of power i requested my name be removed. At this time paladins have been keeping a close eye on for awhile only adding to our suspicions.
Seeing that we already assumed you were working within the BOS with bad faith. Yes the screen shot was all we provided to staff to have remove. But these many cases and retelling is why you were removed but was not provided to staff. We just neatly compiled our case and reasoning behind your removal
As for legion and MEF/Fiends. We have thrown around the idea but never came to agree if we were to follow through. Their are logs to back this up but no such go ahead for you to speak or change our standing with them. As the codex states "All final decisions must be approved by the High Council."
As for the quate of you saying you are already doing the job of the elder. I was there and can agree those words were said. I have no video or audio proof but was present for it.
You asked him to remove your name because you came to regret your decision and then used it to turn it around as additional evidence against me (hence why it was mentioned in the post). You were in a call for the ENTIRE LENGTH of the document's composition, as the edit history shows. It was you who then shared screenshots of the document, so you had immediate access to the exact wording of the document as well while your signature was present on the paper. Therefore, you KNEW that I did not sign the document at all, because it was produced and given to you in the timeframe of the call (as proven by the screenshots).
Also: "Throughout the talk I was very against the idea", but you voluntarily put your signature on the entire document....? Come on now.
I never changed our standing with the MEF, as I already said. The screenshot that you provided of the codex literally proves that I have the right to undergo communications. An ambassador is a different thing entirely, where a member of the Brotherhood is appointed to (over a long period of time) be that factions representative to an ally or faction undergoing relations. This is just not really an issue of dispute.
"Seeing that we already assumed you were working within the BOS with bad faith." This is just a Freudian slip that immediately discredits your statement that " As for the quate of you saying you are already doing the job of the elder. I was there and can agree those words were said. I have no video or audio proof but was present for it", as it is pretty clear that you will be prone to interpret what I say as uncharitably as possible.

